Reading between the Lines, Interpreting Music Essay

Listening to music is a fabulous way to spend time. However, learning about the way this music was creates is a nonetheless exciting experience, and When We Were Good by Robert S. Cantwell, as well as The Rose & the Briar: Death, Love and Liberty in the American Ballad by Greil Markus provide such an opportunity. Which is even more exciting, the two books offer a lot of food for thoughts and raise many interesting questions.

Advertising

We will write a custom Essay on Reading between the Lines, Interpreting Music specifically for you

for only

$16.05

$11/page

Learn More

The best thing about When We Were Good is that it helps the readers recall some of their first music experiences, which must have started with the introduction to the world of animated movies. It was rather surprising to find out that famous Joan Baez and Bob Dylan worked on one of the soundtracks to Disney’s masterpiece, Lady and the Tramp , playing the part of the Siamese cats.

Not only did this news expand my understanding of the genres in which Baez and Dylan performed, but also helped realize how important media is in terms of shaping one’s culture, and how well child impressions can be cemented in one’s memory. After reading When We Were Good , a number of people can hear the famous line “We are Siamese, if you please” somewhat differently.

One of the things that made me wonder, though, is the fact that in his essay, “We Did Them Wrong,” Cecil Brown makes a clear statement about “Frankie and Albert” being based off of a single incident. To be more exact, Brown links the ballad to the infamous murder of Allen Britt, which was committed by Frankie Baker earlier. On the one hand, everything from the names in the title of the song to the lyrics points at the fact that the song could be written to honor the memory of Britt and make the audience recall the incident.

On the other hand, nothing in the song states explicitly that these are Allen Britt and Frankie Baker that the author is talking about; for what it is worth, the author could be talking about anyone of the same name, starting from his friends at up to fictional characters. Therefore, Brown’s bold statement about the way in which the song was created and what it was inspired by somehow rubs the wrong way.

However, when it comes to analyzing the author’s original intent and idea, the discussion might turn rather heated, since there is no rule on how to interpret a work. Dave Marsh’s Barbara Allen , for instance, begs a similar question, making one guess whether the title of the most widespread folk song in the U.S. is actually praise or a statement of the song being slowly worn out. There are different schools of thoughts, each offering its own idea of the author’s intent.

Some say that the author’s vision https://youressayreviews.com/review-of-essaytyper-com/ is the only valid one out there; others claim that once the work is open to discussion, it is free to be interpreted any which way the audience sees as possible. Thus, it is reasonable to admit that Brown’s idea of what the song is about has the right to exist, as well as the rest of the opinions on the issue, yet it still can be taken with a grain of salt.

Advertising

Looking for a paper on Musical Compositions ? Let’s see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF

Learn More

Offering a lot of food for thoughts, The Rose & the Briar: Death, Love and Liberty in the American Ballad helps the readers discover the aspects of the world of music that they have never heard of, revealing the readers new shades of meanings of the songs and compositions that used to seem a well-trodden path.

Mrs. Hale Different but Equal – Legitimate Gender Differences Critical Essay

Inequalities between men and women turn out to be one of the most controversial topics to discuss in any forum. There are many powerful literary characters which help us to understand the essence of these differences, and one of them is Mrs. Hale in Susan Glaspell’s Trifles.

Advertising

We will write a custom Essay on Mrs. Hale: Different but Equal – Legitimate Gender Differences specifically for you

for only

$16.05

$11/page

Learn More

In this play, the character of Mrs. Hale helps the reader look at gender differences and consider whether the characteristics by which genders are differentiated are legitimate. Mrs. Hale proves that there are situations that benefit from evaluation from different perspectives, and a female point of view may be not just of equal importance but in fact in some circumstances more important, than the male.

At the beginning of the play, the role of Mrs. Hale is portrayed as insignificant. Her presence in the room is dismissed by the men and the stage directions “ The women have come in slowly, and stand close to the door.” (Glaspell 668). The authority and domination of the men is evident. The women characters have no lines until well into the fourth page of the play. Male domination is made evident by an off handed comment made by Mr. Hale. “I was going to see if I can’t get John Wright to go in with me on a party telephone.

I thought maybe if I went to the house and talked about it before his wife, though I didn’t know as what this wife wanted made much difference to John—.” (668) Although Mr. Hale charges that “women are used to worrying over trifles.” (670), it quickly becomes evident to the reader that, albeit a gross generality, the natural attention to detail, instinct, intuition, sympathy and empathy possessed by women will be a critical factor is revealing what really happened at the Wright farm.

We discover, only through Mrs. Hale’s keen observations and extrapolation of meaning through the use of her instinct and intuition, that there are many pieces of evidence in the house to confirm the murderer, the motives and perhaps even the justification.

She finds the broken birdcage and with her intimate knowledge of the vibrant Minnie Foster “She used to wear pretty cloths and be lively, one of the town girls singing in the choir.” (672) and the cold John Wright “I stayed away because it weren’t cheerful –…Wright out to work all day, and no company when he did come in. …he was a hard man…” (675), she pieces together a credible mosaic of circumstances that brings into focus for the reader what likely happened at the Wright farm.

In fact, the songbird in the play is one of the most captivating symbols for the feminine. https://aussieessayreviews.com/review-of-edubirdie-com-services/ Mrs. Wright could be seen as a songbird in a cage created by her husband from which she could never escape, except through death. In her case the death of her captor.

Advertising

Looking for a paper on Plays ? Let’s see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF

Learn More

It’s only fitting that Mrs. Hale can intuitively see this connection even though she may not express it in those exact terms. This ability is something that is quite possibly outside the realm and possibility of a stereotypical male thought process, certainly a typical patriarchal male of the time.

Works Cited

Glaspell, Susan. “Trifles.” Backpack Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama . Ed. X.J. Kennedy & Dana Gioia. New York: Pearson Longman, 2006. 570 – 583.

Questionable Premise Essay (Critical Writing)

Introduction

On 21 December of the year 2009 in the New York Times, there was an article by Natalie Angier titled, “ Sorry, Vegans: Brussels sprouts like to live, too ”. The views presented by Natalie here suggest that animals do endure being eaten by man in order to serve the exchange of the damage to plants from which there comes man’s plant diet.

Advertising

We will write a custom Critical Writing on Questionable Premise specifically for you

for only

$16.05

$11/page

Learn More

The view by the author here is that it is scientifically correct to say that animals are ready to suffer the atrocities of being eaten by man because they consider this the only way to help ease the suffering of plants, which form the greatest portion of man’s meals. To the author, this position is scientific. This is indeed portrayed in the point that her article appears under the section of the paper that is titled “science”.

This line of thinking is basically untrue and thus a fallacy. It is a thinking that is not supported by either logic or science. In logic, if the assertion were true, then the occurrence would be that when animals are being slaughtered, they would not resist because they would be ‘aware’ that they are ‘helping’ the plants. However, the truth is that animals do not ‘agree’ to be killed. Sensing death, they kick and try to run away.

This shows that they are not ready to die because they do not have a ‘reason’ for this. The author would have had a chance if her premise was clear. Nevertheless, she greatly fails to satisfy scientific logic. In science, truth is that animals have the capacity to think. Their thinking is however at the rudimentary stage. No science has proved that animal have the capacity to think to this level that the author assigns them.

The author is thus wrong to think that her assertion is scientific. Scientific facts generally have some elements that have to be fulfilled. Besides being supported by evidence from other researches, any assertion made in science has to have the capability to be proved when another research is done using the tools set out. In the case of this article’s assertion, there is no way of proving what she says to be true. This is because she does not even present a way in which she arrived at her conclusion youressayreviews.com.

Conclusion

Basing on all these, it is true to conclude that her article and the assertion she makes relating to eating behaviors and the place of animals and plants in this, is indeed a wrong thinking. Taking note of all the inadequacies by the author in presenting evidence on a premise she builds on her argument, it is correct to conclude that she falls prey to the fallacy of presenting information on a false premise, thus the fallacy of questionable premise.

Works Cited

Angier, Natalie. Sorry, Vegans: Brussels sprouts like to live, too. New York Times, 21 Dec. 2009. Web. < https://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/science/22angi.html?_r=1 >.

Advertising

Looking for a paper on Journalism ? Let’s see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF

Learn More

My Classroom From Hell Essay (Article)

During the writer’s senior year at Yale in 2000, he turned down a job with an Al Gore pollster to teach in the Emery Elementary in Washington. This was an inner city school and from the start, he was warned it was not going to be easy. The skills that he had picked up during summer from the TFA (Teach For America) was not helpful in running the fifth grade classroom at Emery(Kaplowitz, 2003).

Advertising

We will write a custom Article on My Classroom From Hell specifically for you

for only

$16.05

$11/page

Learn More

As a white teacher in a dominantly black school, he was racially harassed and most people did not believe in him. The principal was unhelpful and criticized every attempt he made to manage the classroom. After thwarting all his efforts and filling his report with criticism comments, he was demoted to teach the second grade. The class was worse than the fifth grade, but I was determined to succeed(Kaplowitz, 2003).

On June 13, 2001, a student accused him of assault. In the following months, the student’s mother filled a $20 million lawsuit against the school district. In March 2002, he was found not guilty, but the mother pursed civil damages. After refusing to pay her $200,000, the school system agreed to settler her demands.

Though his experience in Emery is not unique to most public schools, there are those schools that have shown that a public edubirdie.com legit school does not have to be a hellhole. With the help of a strong willed principal, the schools can be a better place(Kaplowitz, 2003).

References

Kaplowitz, J. (2003). My Classroom From Hell. The Wall Street edubirdie.com legit Journal. Web.

“The Golden Ass” by Lucius Apuleius Essay- by EduBirdie

Love is a concept that has been a center of humanity for a very long time. Ancient philosophers have stipulated on the significance and meaning of love for many years and it still stays the subject of much contemplation today. Lucius Apuleius describes love from several perspectives in “The Golden Ass” and shows how it can be wanted and needed but at the same time, mean harm and evil.

Essay on “The Golden Ass” by Lucius Apuleius

for only

custom paper writing service reviews

Many things in the world depend on personal views and opinions but also, on the qualities and circumstances, as one thing can be seen differently by a number of people. Love takes up a large part in “The Golden Ass” and it is shown to be pure and evil.

For example, when Apuleius talks to Fotis, it is evident that love is divine and meant to bring peace and comfort into his life. The deepness of the feeling is very evident and also, the qualities that accompany love are given. At one point, Apuleius’ emotions are made evident:

“But I pray you tell me how have you been the cause and mean of my trouble and sorrow? For I dare sweare by the love that I beare unto you, and I will not be perswaded, though you your selfe should endeavor the same, that ever you went to trouble or harm me: perhaps sometimes you imagined an evil thought in your mind, which afterwards you revoked, but that is not bee deemed as a crime” (Apuleius 94).

There are several truths discussed here and the most obvious one is that Apuleius has great feelings towards Fotis. They are not burdened by any doubts or selfish motives in their evil sense, his love is pure and he expects the same in return. This is a clear sign that love was meant to be shown as pure and divine. Apuleius asks Fotis to explain how particularly she has been the cause of his distress.

This shows that his feelings are most sincere and he does not blame others for his misfortunes. Usually, people take advantage of those they love, as the person closest, be it a relative, friend or romantic partner, will be able to withstand criticism and hurt. The person using the relationship knows that the connection is much deeper and the quarrel will not separate the two people.

This shows trust and guarantees that a person has within themselves. But in this case, Apuleius does not take advantage of the way Fotis feels about him, he does not use her love and his feelings to lose control and even hint any guilt of hers (Lindner 14). It is possible to assume that even in case she was at fault, he would not mention that or completely deny it altogether.

Romantic Literature ?

This sort of affection and connection to another person is representative of the whole positive side of love in “The Golden Ass”, as it represents the highest moral understanding and affection towards another person. Furthermore, Apuleius says that his love should be the proof of his thoughts and actions or vice versa. Usually, the feeling comes first and then, a person acts on the feelings with words and actions.

It is directly and undeniably shown that Apuleius is fully consumed by his love, so his actions and words are all dictated by his feeling and its purity. And when he states that she should be able to understand it herself, means that he expects the same understanding and emotion from her glassdoor.com, as it would be a fair and appropriate response to his own love.

Also, Apuleius shows that he has sufficient understanding of love and how people treat it, when he acknowledges that sometimes people might think something bad or allow doubt to take over but as long as these thoughts are not acted upon, the person should not be thought of as guilty of ill will. Not only is Apuleius full of feeling, he is also morally correct and truthful to himself.

He knows that people can sometimes hurt others or think something negative, even if they fully love a person. This means that he either knows human nature very well through others, or he was able to analyze his own feelings and judge himself. “The Golden Ass” is an example of truths and love which can be discovered by a person.

Another great analysis of love and feelings that accompany affection is “Socrates’ Second Speech”. It can be seen as a separate entity in relation to his previous reasoning, as it distinctly talks about love and the unique qualities that it exhibits. His line of thinking is very evident here, as he logically examines the qualities that love has and what they lead to.

best essay writers review

As people do not produce love consciously, they are met with the fact that it exists and that they have it inside them. This leaves one option—contemplation and logical reasoning about the feeling that one possesses and what sort of characteristics it entails. Socrates makes a link between love and “madness” (Nichols 106). As both are so unordinary, there is a connection between them and it is not necessarily a negative one.

Socrates confirms that very many things in the world take their origin in the said madness and what comes out is often great and divine. This supposes that love is not a human creation but people are given a chance to experience it. As this concept is so enormous and overtaking of everything else, Socrates allows for a certain length of discussion, as to clearly express what he thinks and feels about it.

In reality, almost all, if not everything in life is ordered and framed by love. It might be love towards an object, a concept or a person. People tend to do things they like and receive pleasure from, and love and affection are based on these characteristics. Thus, Socrates says that love must be pure and people should cherish the fact that they have it.

It is not a toy that can be played with but at the same time, it is not a self functioning mechanism that can be left without care and development. When one has love, it must be treated with respect and honor. If two people give into evil urges and lose track of the divine nature of love, taking it to the side of evil, it will become a destructive and negative force.

It is a fact that Socrates was a great philosopher and by the way he reasons about love, it is possible to see that he based his thoughts and actions of the feeling that came from his character and unique individuality. A person, who does not know love, never experienced it and did not feel the pleasure and often pain, cannot speak about love and tell others what it is.

essay company review

When Socrates aligns love with madness, he wants to demonstrate that the feeling is so unusual and overtaking that it must be given time to be properly understood and acted upon.

Both Socrates and Apuleius describe love in very similar terms from several angles. For Socrates, it is feelings that can drive one mad and possibly turn them into a maniac, which sometimes does happen in the world. For Apuleius, it is a flower that must be cherished and should not be hurt. Their opinions describe the same concept and unite in the fact that love must be taken seriously and not meddled with.

Socrates reiterates that in order for love to be pure and real people must have self control and understanding of what specifically is taking place. When one gets lost in themselves, chaos takes over and love becomes an evil that cannot be compared to anything else more negative. The same is true when Apuleius talks about love towards Fotis.

The depth and sincere nature of love are shown as the pinnacle of human emotions and it is contrasted with those who do not take care of love (Belfiore 9). “The Golden Ass” is filled with examples of people who participate in forbidden love, adultery and other kinds of love that are not permitted. This is made specifically obvious, so that the audience sees the contrast between the two kinds of love.

Thus, Socrates and Apuleius see love very similarly, as they explain the process and circumstances, as well as consequences of pure and evil love. Pure love is that of goodness while evil, “…that most filthy, brutal, and base love is not engendered from the nature of things, but from disease and corporeal infirmity…” (Taylor 357).

“The Golden Ass” by Lucius Apuleius by yourself? We can help you

for only

most reliable essay writing service

This goes to show that one must see the clear difference between the two and make sure evil does not overpower goodness. There is another major theme that connects both thinkers in their views and it is the unexplained nature of love. Socrates and Apuleius speak extensively about the divine qualities of love and the direct connection to Gods.

Here, Gods are representative of something unexplained and not of the Earth. People have known love throughout existence but its origins are unknown. Humanity is not the one that created love; people are simply the receivers and givers. Usually, something that cannot be specifically and scientifically explained is attributed to higher forces and Gods (Cristaudo 130).

Love is described to be exactly that—an attribute of something Gods would do, as “madness”, sending it upon people. Those who are not ready to treat it and take care of it will face consequences of evil and bad fortune.

According to such conception, love must not be questioned by its origins, as it is more important how to treat it, instead of spend time figuring out where it came from. The two perspectives of proper and improper love are made visible, as people often indulge in activities that make love an extreme evil.

In conclusion, it has been shown that love is an entity that is closely tied with humans, yet is somehow separate in its origins. One thing stays fixed in any possibility is that it must be treated with honesty and respect because any diversion from morality or truth will destroy love and make it into an evil of the worst kind.

Works Cited

top essay

Apuleius, Lucius. The Golden Ass: The Metamorphoses of Lucius Apuleius. Auckland, New Zealand. The Floating Press, 2009. Print.

Belfiore, Elizabeth. Socrates’ Daimonic Art: Love for Wisdom in Four Platonic Dialogues. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Print.

Cristaudo, Wayne. A Philosophical History of Love . Piscataway, Untied States: Transaction Publishers, 2012. Print.

Lindner, Matthias. What is love – Are love and romance nothing but socially constructed? Munich, Germany: GRIN Verlag, 2005. Print.

Nichols, Mary. Socrates on Friendship and Community . New York, United States: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Print.

Taylor, Thomas. The Metamorphosis Or, Golden Ass: And Philosophical Works of Apuleius. Whitefish, United States: Kessinger Publishing, 1992 edubirdie reviews.io. Print.

“The Allegory of the Cave” by Plato Essay- by EduBirdie

The parable of the cave by Plato was an attempt to highlight the importance of education to the achievement of wisdom. Plato compared the parable to the processes that a person goes through as a philosopher.

Essay on “The Allegory of the Cave” by Plato

for only

He argues that once a person has been enlightened to the level of a philosopher, he should go back to the mundane world (the cave) and try to educate his fellow men. The cave or ordinary world is characterized by greed, self-interest, and struggle for political power. The parable is a criticism of people who are enslaved by their senses.

A key theme of the parable is how people are shackled to warped perceptions, unaware of the reality. It is composed of five components namely; the shadow, the ordinary man, the fire, the ascending and the descending men.

The shadow is perhaps the most yelp.com complex concept to understand in this allegory. It relates to the concept of ‘‘forms’’ one of Plato’s many concepts which have withstood the test of time. He believed that most concepts formed by people through the five common senses do not represent real objects but they are only images or shadows created from distorted perceptions.

The same case applies to the ethics of decision-making and acting in real life, as well as our ideas regarding the truth. What people believe to be right or wrong or true in life is based on limited knowledge and experiences as opposed to complete knowledge.

The ordinary man symbolizes all persons before they have attained complete education. This man perceives nothing apart from the images on the cave’s wall. The images stand for all the things that we have observed in our lives. As the shadows form the set of all the things we have ever observed, they represent the reality to us.

Attaining education entails gaining the capacity to discern everything both in and outside the cave. The purpose of the third component, the fire, is to shine light on the real objects, casting off shadows on the cave’s wall. In this way, the fire contributes to the creation of the realities as perceived by the ordinary man.

Philosophy ?

Yet another component is that of the ascending man. This is a person who is lucky enough to be liberated from the fetters of the cave in which the ordinary man resides. After his escape, the ascending man ultimately gains a grasp of the real objects and he attains complete knowledge or education.

He realizes that the shadows were only a glimpse of the reality but not the reality itself. The fire gives us a blurred notion of what the real forms look like but, until you emerge from the cave, the only notion that you will have is an ‘‘image’’ of the reality. The last component of the parable is that of the descending man.

This is a person who has escaped from the cave and achieved full education. He then returns to the cave to enlighten his fellow men on what he learned outside the cave. His objective is to show them that what they believe to be real is just a shadow of the reality but the reality itself is different.

This narration is essentially about how Socrates was persecuted by his contemporaries because of his wisdom. The reason why the descending man went back to the cave after having been liberated was to inform his unenlightened colleagues about the beauty au.edubirdie.com review of the world outside the cave.

As a result of his bid to educate his fellow men he was put to death. The allegory corresponds very much to our lives today. Despite having very many civil liberties such as the freedom of speech, we have failed to use these freedoms to think positively, basically confining ourselves to a cave.

The sole way of becoming emancipated from this confinement is by being open-minded and by looking at things from all perspectives. We should also heed the counsel of philosophers and take an honest assessment of their views instead of banishing them off-hand.

The philosophers possess knowledge of the world outside the cave. However, the cave dwellers think that the descending man (the philosopher) is insane when he gives them an account of the world as it exists outside. The situation is the same today in the political arena where ordinary people accustomed to the ways of dishonest politicians, often persecute those who seek to change the status quo.

The real mad men, however, are the ordinary men who are ready to discriminate the enlightened people based on warped beliefs. In spite of the persecution, those who are fully educated still feel that it is their moral responsibility to liberate the ordinary people from their ignorance which the politicians use to take advantage of them.

There are many enlightened people in the modern world who become political prisoners because of their attempts to educate the masses about their political and civil rights and liberties.

Why Plato Finds Ascent to the Truth Confusing and Painful

According to Plato, the journey towards enlightenment is long and winding and it involves a lot of painstaking. The inhabitants of the cave have to struggle in order to free themselves and attain full education. The ascending man had to pass through the phase of the ‘‘shadow’’ of reality before entering the phase of intellectual reasoning and comprehension.

He had to be transformed from an ordinary person to an enlightened one and this transformation called for a lot of courage to go against the orthodox, and to withstand the truth as truth sometimes is intimidating. As Socrates says concerning the ascending man, he is likely to experience pain from the glare of light (enlightenment).

The reason for this distress lies in the fact that knowing the truth may at times be disturbing. Other virtues required to obtain full wisdom are curiosity and scrupulousness. For a person to become liberated from the shackles of ignorance, one has to reason beyond the limits of the ordinary world.

This would ordinarily need one to give up some leisure and withstand the criticism of cynics and skeptics who do not see the value of pursuing wisdom. The journey to attaining enlightenment is confusing since there are a lot of false and ill-conceived ideas on what should be the truth. Therefore, it requires a keen intellect to separate the truth from the half-truths and the outright false notions.

My Personal Experience that Illustrates Plato’s Allegory

Many uneducated voters in the developing countries usually elect mediocre politicians who come from their tribes instead of voting for those candidates who are likely to bring the most needed economic development.

When educated persons try to run for political posts, they always lose because politics in these countries are tribal-based as opposed to issue-based. The uneducated voters in developing countries can be equated to Plato’s ordinary men living in a cave as far as political enlightenment is concerned.

“The Allegory of the Cave” by Plato by yourself? We can help you

for only

The educated persons who attempt to vie for political positions, on the other hand, are like Plato’s descending men who feel that it is their moral responsibility to free their colleagues from ignorance.

“Sicko” a Documentary by Michael Moore Essay- by EduBirdie

Sicko is a documentary film produced by Michael Moore, who is an American filmmaker. The film mainly investigates issues of health care in the United States where it focuses on the pharmaceutical industry and health insurance. It compares the non-universal organizations in the United States which make profit with that of universal health care organisations which do not make profit and are based in the United Kingdom, Cuba, Canada and France.

Essay on “Sicko” a Documentary by Michael Moore

for only

Moore was mainly dedicated to exposing social injustices and corruption in health care industry in the United States. He shed light on the issue by casting out those people who had been disappointed by the health care industry in the United States. Despite the fact that the documentary act as an entertainment, it is also very educative. In spite of raising staid questions about the United States Health Care System while emphasizing on its failures, one may be more entertained.

The comical atmosphere in the film is intentional; majorly to expose the United States broken Health Care System while addressing critical issue without raving on like violent www.sitejabber.com lunatic. Moore could have also introduced a comic atmosphere in the film to attract attention to enable people watch the film. It was a marketing strategy to enable him sale the film to earn some money from it (Dokoupil 98).

However, despite what Moore’s personal reasons was, the film still managed to raise valid objectives and questions on unethical practices of insurance companies and broken system. Moore used anecdotes to demonstrate the predicament of 46 million Americans who suffered because they lacked the health insurance.

The documentary begins with Moore narrating how he invites different citizens to share their horrific stories about the health care. This was before he filmed the movie. The narration took one week to complete and therefore opened a website for it which was inundated with more than 25000 mails (Holtz 120).

This huge number gave most people the urge https://www.resellerratings.com/store/Edubirdie_com to want to hear what those who were interviewed said. Moore presented three cases in the first half of the documentary. The three represented the plight of 46 million people who suffered in America since they lacked health insurance.

Sicko managed to bring to light how Americans are not able or are ignorant to fix their health care system while those in Europe are capable of solving and fixing their own health care problems. The film enabled people to see and realise encroachment of corporate influences and greed in health care in the United States.

Entertainment & Media ?

Those who are involved in health care politics and determining health care policies are corrupt since they have not fixed health care problems that affect a large population causing many people to suffer or even lose their lives or loved ones. The President Commission who are concerned with health care have fallen short of declaring all the needs for universal health care in America (Callenbach 110).

Sicko was an eye opener to many Americans since it left many people to inquire what has prevented many political parties or forces from developing heath care reforms yet many people still suffer. They should have done it for the sake of the citizens. The documentary clearly brought out the widespread consequences of American current health care system.

Today, both insured and non-insured citizens of America suffer. You may think that insured people do not face problems but that is not the case for Americans. The documentary made people become aware of the reality that exists in American health care. The plight of insured people is worse than those people who are uninsured.

It is time that America fixes out its health care system for the sake of its citizens. According to Moore, Americans should draw or learn from other countries such as Cuba, Canada and France. The Health Care expenses should be checked perhaps taxes should be regulated to enable Americans experience the best Health Care.

Works Cited

Callenbach, Ernest. Sicko. Film Quarterly .California: University of California Press , 2008.

Dokoupil, Tony. Why Michael Moore Helped Save Enemy Site. Baywood: International Journal of Health Services, 2007.

Holtz, Andrew. National Survey Shows Michael Moore’s Sicko Did Indeed Provoke Discussions about US Health Care System. New York: Oncology Times Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc, 2007.